Welcome 20/20 Viewers

Hello Everyone!

I’m taking a day off from working on the book to catch everyone up on a couple of items, especially since there might be new readers after the TV show 20/20 airs an interview with me for a two hour special about the terrible murders of Sam Herr and Julie Kibuishi (airing Friday, May 31 at 9:00PM local time on ABC).

For those who are new to the blog: Welcome! Thank you for checking it out. I hope you’ll read all the posts from the beginning.

I Know What He Is

As the title of the blog says, I am friends with Daniel Wozniak, who is currently on death row in San Quentin prison after being found guilty of killing both Sam and Julie.

I need to be very clear: I believe Daniel Wozniak is a murderer.  He’s honest about that with me. He’s not some wrongly convicted innocent person serving time for a crime he didn’t commit.

When I began this blog in 2015, Dan still hadn’t been to trial. Even though I was always pretty sure he was probably guilty of his crimes, I firmly believe a person is innocent until proven guilty, so before Dan’s conviction, everything I wrote about him used the word “alleged” when referring to his crimes. There were plenty of readers who didn’t like that, and didn’t like me because I was willing to “call that monster my friend.”

The murders of Sam Herr and Julie Kibuishi were monstrous.

About Sam Herr

Sam Herr was a decorated Army veteran who served in Afghanistan. Sam was stationed at Outpost Keating; which I learned about after reading Jake Tapper’s The Outpost: An Untold Story of American Valor (recommended to me by Sam’s dad, Steve Herr, during Daniel’s trial).

Sam Herr, his parents’ only child, returned safely from fighting in a war, went to college to better his future, and was then shot and killed by a community theatre actor.

As an extra gut-punch, Steve and Raquel Herr had to learn their son’s body had been dismembered.

His head had been removed. His hand and arm had been sawed or chopped off.  Sam’s body parts were stashed at a public nature center and eaten by animals.

And Sam’s parents learned about it all on what should have been Sam’s twenty -seventh birthday.

About Julie Kibuishi

Julie Kibuishi was a friend of Sam’s from college. The two met in an Anthropology class at Orange Coast College, and Julie offered to tutor Sam, who initially was having some difficulties with his grades. He ended up getting an A, and the two continued a close friendship.

By all accounts, this lovely, talented, and intelligent young woman would come to the aid of her friends at the drop of a hat. Julie is always described as kind, sweet, generous, funny, and talented (she graduated from Orange County School of the Arts, a prestigious arts high school).

She was only twenty-three years old; one of four children in a very tight knit family.

When she was shot twice in the head, she was wearing a costume tiara given to her hours before, when she was asked to be a bridesmaid in her brother’s upcoming wedding.

Why I Used A Pseudonym

There are people who can’t wrap their heads around how, or why, I’m able to be friends with the man who confessed to murdering these two people. I understand the confusion, shock, and sometimes outrage some readers have expressed in this blog’s comment section and on the Facebook page.

If you’ve been reading the blog for a while, you know I have used a pseudonym (Murderer Musings) from the beginning. I used pseudonyms for all the people involved, since I wanted to write about Daniel Wozniak without influencing his trial in any way.

When I found out this was not a concern for him, I started using everyone’s real names.

Everyone except me.

The story of Sam and Julie’s murders was already all over the media, but my name wasn’t and I felt the need to keep it that way. Early on, some commenters threatened me, and my children.

But truth be told, anyone could — and some people did — figure out my identity through unintentional but unavoidable “clues” in the blog.

After a while, and hopefully after reading my posts, most people got used to the idea of Dan Wozniak having a friend and that friend writing about him.

Seeking To Understand

Readers discovered that I’m not defending Dan’s actions. I’m just trying to understand how he sunk so low at one point in his life, and write about what kind of person he is today. I don’t want to judge a person by the worst thing he ever did.

I started the blog as a jumping off point to writing a true crime book about the murders of Sam and Julie. It’s my first time writing a true crime book (or any book for that matter) and I felt like I could use a little experience before tackling the Big Kahuna.

After some time, I felt secure enough that I decided to use my real name when the book comes out. Of course, with the 20/20 interview, the cat’s out of the bag a little early.

How It Began

Like many of you who are reading this, I’m extremely fascinated with true crime. I’ve been a huge fan of the genre for a very long time. In 2010, when I learned that an actor from my theatre company had just confessed to murdering two of his friends for money to go on a honeymoon… hell yes, I wanted to know more.

I wrote a letter to Dan at the Orange County Jail and… well you can read the blog to follow the story as it unfolded.

The Official Story Isn’t Necessarily the True Story

From early on, I had doubts that the public had been given the complete and honest story of Sam and Julie’s murders.

When I read about the case and saw interviews with law enforcement, my true-crime Spidey senses told me that, in spite of his confession, Dan Wozniak did not commit these two murders alone.

I’ve been learning the “true” story from Daniel himself these past couple of years, especially once Dan Wozniak was transferred to San Quentin, where our visits are not recorded.

It’s a bizarre story of an engaged couple whose jealousy and game playing led to the murders of two much-beloved people who did nothing to provoke their own deaths.

It’s not a nice story.

But in many ways, to me it makes much more sense than the one that came out in Daniel’s trial.  My plan is to have my book finished in about a year and a half, so I can share that story with all of you.

Thank You For Being Here

Thank you for checking out my blog. I’m writing this before the 20/20 episode airs, so hopefully I come across as the semi-normal person I am.

So, again: welcome new readers!

And to my old readers: Hey guys! I’m on 20/20. And I’m finally dropping that pseudonym!

Hi! I’m Glendele.

Reenactment Time

You guys know I’m a fervent viewer of true crime television. I TiVo “season pass” about 80% of the shows on the Investigation Discover Channel. I am an ID Addict.

There are two main types of TV true-crime shows. There are the “news” shows and the “reenactment” shows.

Dateline, 20/20, and 48 Hours are examples of “news” shows. They are more serious and faithful to the facts. By the time an episode of one of these shows is aired on the ID Channel, though, it was likely shown on its major TV network a year earlier. A slightly edited and repackaged version will air as “Dateline on ID,” for example.

Then there are the reenactment shows. I’m not sure how many of them are produced directly for the ID Network, but they obviously have a lower production budget, and often seem to be filmed outside of California.

I’m noticing more and more are coming from Canada. You can tell as soon as someone says the word “about,” or if they show lush green grass. Our drought and watering restrictions have made California pretty brown these days.

Both the news and the reenactment shows tell stories using interviews and news footage spliced together in a montage of information. Often, a law or psychology expert is consulted as well.

It’s the reenactment programs, however, that bring to life previously unexplored possibilities. If a 20/20 correspondent interviews a police officer involved in the case, the officer might discuss theories that arose from the investigation. A reenactment program will take those theories and make them a reality. They act out the scenes right in front of the viewer’s eyes.

The Perfect Murder Reenactment

The first reenactment show to cover Daniel’s case was The Perfect Murder. The title of the episode was “Curtain Call.”

Thank you Twitter follower Anthony P. for letting me (and Daniel) know about the airing.

 The Perfect Murder is only in its first season, and I honestly thought it would be one of the old-timers like Nightmare Next Door that would first tap into the plethora of drama circling around this case.

I have to assume that the title of the series is meant to be ironic, because the murders of Sam Herr and Julie Kibuishi were far from perfect in their planning or deed.

Overall, I thought The Perfect Murder made a decent attempt at telling the story, but there were certain aspects of the show, either done for dramatic effect or from lack of knowledge, that could have been confusing for someone who was learning of this crime for the first time.

The show took Daniel’s confession as absolute fact, and then had lookalikes act it out. This included the stories Daniel made up when he was first questioned.

The Costa Mesa Police originally suspected Sam Herr of murdering Julie Kibuishi, whose body was found in his apartment. That is how it was set up to look, and it was one of the early lies Daniel told to the police. Viewers of The Perfect Murder got to see all of those investigation theories actually brought to life, and I found it disconcerting to watch a drunken lookalike Sam being abusive and violent to a lookalike Julie.

Who am I to worry about this? No one, I guess. It was pointed out to me that I watch these types of shows all the time, and normally I view those reenactments as merely engaging television.

Steve Herr and June Kibuishi were both interviewed for the program, so they most likely signed off on what the show was going to put out to the public.

This crime already has so many twists and turns to it, and I don’t necessarily trust people to pay complete attention to what they are watching (or reading, for that matter). I bet if you questioned a hundred people who saw that episode, you’d find at least a one or two of them think everything they saw acted out was fact.

The episode “Curtain Call” gave the impression that the murder and decapitation of Sam Herr took place in the same theatre where Daniel and Rachel were performing in the musical Nine. It showed a blood-covered Daniel washing up at a theatre and then changing immediately into his costume (while looking in a mirror and laughing evilly, of course).

I know that it adds an extra layer of horror knowing the murders of Sam and Julie took place on the same weekend that Daniel and Rachel were performing in Nine, but these events did not happen in the same location.

Maybe nobody else cares about this, but Sam was not murdered at the Hunger Artists Theatre Company where Nine was being performed. That’s the theatre where I first met Daniel. Our little theatre didn’t even have an upstairs. The reenactment Hunger Artists looked similar to the real place, albeit nicer, but I don’t really like people thinking that those of us who ran Hunger Artists were a bunch of unaware idiots who allowed a murder to take place right above our stage.

In reality, Sam Herr was murdered at the Liberty Theater at the Los Alamitos Joint Forces Training Base, where, later, the majority of his remains were found.

file-aug-30-12-37-59-pm_300x327Did it make for exciting television? Sure. Scenes of Daniel and Rachel singing lovingly to each other interspersed with images of Daniel cleaning off a bloody saw… that makes for high drama. But if that didn’t happen, what else didn’t happen?

You readers know I don’t entirely believe Daniel’s confession, especially when it comes to the motivation behind the murders. Even officers who worked on the case think Daniel is still not being completely truthful about everything that happened to Sam and Julie, or who was involved.

pmr1_300x238The actor playing Daniel did do his homework. He must have put in some real time (no pun intended) watching clips of Daniel’s police interview and videos of Daniel performing in Nine. The clothes, the way he adjusted his tie on stage, and that crazy laugh all seemed pretty accurate. He’s a better singer than real Daniel, though.

I wonder if The Perfect Murder had a costumer working on the show or if the actors were asked to just bring in their own clothes. It all depends on their budget I guess. Lookalike Daniel was wearing a pretty accurate rendition of the ugly shirt real Daniel wore in his confession video. Well done.

I was most impressed with the Rachel lookalike. I took some screen shots of my TV and sent the pictures of the reenactment actors to Daniel in jail. He thought the actress playing Rachel was spot on visually. She also had a lovely singing voice and, if my memory serves me correctly, real Rachel is a talented singer (she’s better than Daniel, too).

file-aug-30-11-53-26-am_300x274The romantic proposal scene between Daniel and Rachel also didn’t actually happen in real life. It makes for good TV, though, and really emphasizes how psychotic Daniel is meant to seem as he goes from slipping a diamond ring on the finger of an excited and blindfolded Rachel (a glass of champagne in her other hand) to committing double murder.

The show seemed to run out of steam near the end when they showed a snippet of Daniel’s trial. They definitely ran out of visually accurate actors. Prosecutor Matt Murphy isn’t bald in real life. Public defender Scott Sanders is in his 40s, not his late 60s.  Oh, and Judge Conley isn’t African American.

pmr10_300x199 2016-08-28-02-21-18_300x146 2016-08-28-00-46-35_300x193

So, for those readers who have just joined us after seeing The Perfect Murder, and then Googled Daniel’s name, I hope you’ll read this blog from the beginning, keep an open mind, and remember that in the case of a reenactment crime show, seeing shouldn’t always mean believing.

Why Did I Write an Accused Murder?

February 2015

(Post Three)

So. Why did I write Pat in the first place?

And why did I wait 4 years to do it?

My family members have asked these questions.  My friends have asked these questions.  The guards at the jail where I visit Pat have asked these questions.

Why I Wrote An Alleged Double Murderer

The first reason:  This!  What I am doing right now: writing.

I won’t deny it: this guy is FASCINATING!

I wanted to know more.  I wanted to understand.  It’s obvious that there is one hell of a story here, and I wanted to write about Pat. What I’d write was still beyond me, but I wanted to write.

I decided the best way to get this going was to write him a letter.

I didn’t know how to send a letter to someone in jail, but I figured there was some type of protocol.

It took a little searching, but I found out Pat’s birthday (he’s about to turn 31), his full name, his arrest date and his booking number.  The booking number is most important.  You need to put it on the mail you send, and you need to give it to the guards when you visit.
During this Internet searching, I discovered Pat’s trial still hadn’t happened!  I occasionally wondered why I never heard any news or gossip about him. I had no idea he’d been sitting in jail… waiting… all this time.

Right now, he’s in a sort of holding location where most of his fellow inmates will be in and out in a couple of months.  They will either finish their trials and be moved to a prison to serve out their stay, or they are only in jail for a couple of months for some relatively innocuous crime (drug possession or something like that).

Yes, this means I can actually go to Pat’s trial!

This brings us to my second reason for starting this relationship.

I love crime shows!

I don’t mean CSI type dramas.  I’m an ID Addict.

Investigation Discovery is a cable channel that shows non-stop true crime shows like Dateline.

I’m a huge fan of Dateline.  I also love Homicide Hunter, Murder Next Door, A Crime to Remember, True Crime with Aphrodite Jones, Most Evil, 20/20 (when it’s a crime episode and not some boring “my neighbor from Hell” story), Murder Book, On the Case with Paula Zahn… etc. etc.   If a show has the words “Evil,” “Murder” or  “Homicide” in the title, it’s on my TiVo list.

The contents of my bookshelf include The Encyclopedia of Serial Killers, Welcome to Hell: Writings and Letters from Death Row, Helter Skelter, Last Meals (yup, just lists of final meals of inmates before being executed) and many worn out paperbacks about Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Richard Ramirez, David Berkowitz (Son of Sam), Zodiac, BTK, Jeffrey Dahmer… well, you get the picture.

So, I have this (possibly unhealthy) obsession with crimes and killers, and BAM: here is a possible killer who I’ve actually met!!

I’m super fascinated with what makes a person confess to a crime they didn’t commit. I’m in no way saying that this is the case with Pat, but let’s keep an open mind here, people.  If any of you are familiar with the case of The West Memphis Three, then you know sometimes people really do confess to doing some pretty horrific stuff, even when they didn’t do it.

Just sayin’.

Anyway, I wrote a letter to Pat.

Keep in mind that we had only met briefly before his arrest; I wasn’t exactly writing to an old friend.   I was nervous about it, too.  I had no idea if he would remember me or write me back, and if he didn’t write me back… how in the world would I ever be able to write about him?

Also, what do you say to someone who is in jail and being accused of some seriously heinous stuff (double murder and dismemberment of one of the victims)?

Well, I talked about how crappy the dressing rooms had been at our theatre.  I also mentioned that he’d been a huge topic of conversation around the place after he was arrested.  I asked some questions about the truthfulness of Orange is the New Black (LOVE that show and wouldn’t care if it was all lies… but it’s not).

It wasn’t a long letter. Only 3 paragraphs.

He replied to me right away!